<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for David M. Bresnahan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bresnahan.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bresnahan.org</link>
	<description>&#34;Want to enjoy the view? Climb the mountain!&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chris Hedges is Wrong &#8211; Objectivity Makes Journalism Better, Not Worse by David Bresnahan</title>
		<link>http://bresnahan.org/archives/120#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bresnahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://columninch.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Well said! I agree with your very good points. Thank you for making them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! I agree with your very good points. Thank you for making them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chris Hedges is Wrong &#8211; Objectivity Makes Journalism Better, Not Worse by ossurynot</title>
		<link>http://bresnahan.org/archives/120#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>ossurynot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://columninch.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The only objection I can make, because I fundamentally agree with you, is that one of the things journalism has lost is rational objectivity. While the global warming &quot;debate&quot; is the most salient example, it happens all the time. We feel as if we have to find an &quot;alternate view&quot; if we&#039;re to be objective and as a result are too often quasi-PR machines.
Another (related) difficulty has to do with the fact people know there are reporters in the room. I try to be objective in my coverage, but I&#039;m also careful not to report obvious inflammatory rhetoric.
People who do not attend events but count on me to tell them what happened aren&#039;t looking for my opinion, per se, but they do trust me to distill the event. It&#039;s a mistake to report what happened when what happened is irresponsible to report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only objection I can make, because I fundamentally agree with you, is that one of the things journalism has lost is rational objectivity. While the global warming &#8220;debate&#8221; is the most salient example, it happens all the time. We feel as if we have to find an &#8220;alternate view&#8221; if we&#8217;re to be objective and as a result are too often quasi-PR machines.<br />
Another (related) difficulty has to do with the fact people know there are reporters in the room. I try to be objective in my coverage, but I&#8217;m also careful not to report obvious inflammatory rhetoric.<br />
People who do not attend events but count on me to tell them what happened aren&#8217;t looking for my opinion, per se, but they do trust me to distill the event. It&#8217;s a mistake to report what happened when what happened is irresponsible to report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

